home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
071993
/
0719050.000
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
9KB
|
174 lines
<text id=93TT2034>
<title>
July 19, 1993: Traveling Salesman
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
July 19, 1993 Whose Little Girl Is This?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE SUMMIT, Page 26
Traveling Salesman
</hdr>
<body>
<p>In contrast to his struggles at home, Clinton shows finesse
in Tokyo by winning agreements to cut tariffs
</p>
<p>By GEORGE J. CHURCH--With reporting by Edward W. Desmond/Tokyo and Michael Duffy and Dan
Goodgame with Clinton
</p>
<p> He was supposed to be the domestic President, pushing aside
foreign affairs to concentrate on righting the U.S. economy.
So how come Bill Clinton scored better with foreign heads of
government at last week's summit in Tokyo than with the barons
of Congress or the public at home?
</p>
<p> Well, partly because he prepared assiduously, phoning at least
three fellow summiteers from Air Force One before landing in
Tokyo and sitting in on so many late-night briefings that he
pushed himself to the edge of exhaustion. (Or past it; British
Prime Minister John Major cut short a one-on-one meeting at
11 p.m. Wednesday because Clinton was too tired to focus.) Partly
because Clinton gave both government chiefs and the Japanese
public a glimpse of the campaigner the U.S. has not seen since
last November. At the opening summit session Wednesday, he worked
the room like a campaign kaffeeklatsch, stopping to chat briefly
with each of the other leaders before taking his chair. Though
he talked tough at times, he set the tone at that first meeting
with a sentence that sounded more Japanese than Clintonian:
"In hard times we shouldn't react like porcupines. We should
open up like sunflowers." He also appealed directly to the Japanese
public in a speech at Waseda University. One point: Japanese
consumers are hurt by the country's trade restrictions because
they pay outrageous prices for imports.
</p>
<p> Clinton focused his agenda as he has not often done at home.
Agreements to expand trade and to extend more generous aid to
Russia, he told his subordinates, took precedence over everything
else. He harped on the subject of employment, going so far as
to call for a "jobs summit" at the meeting. Expanding trade,
he insisted, was one way out of the stagnant employment that
bedevils all members of the G-7 (for Group of Seven nations--Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the U.S.).
</p>
<p> The President got crucial help from his host. Japanese Prime
Minister Kiichi Miyazawa's career may well be almost over; the
Japanese nickname for him now is "dead body." But if his Liberal
Democratic Party is to continue its 38-year rule past next Sunday's
parliamentary elections, it must convince voters that it is
synonymous with stability, and that involves maintaining good
relations with Japan's foreign partners. Miyazawa thus could
not allow the summit to fail.
</p>
<p> Consequently, it was Miyazawa who made the key concession that
led to the summit's greatest achievement. When Miyazawa overruled
his Finance Ministry to announce that Japan would eliminate
tariffs on "brown" liquors such as whiskey and Cognac, all the
pieces fell into place. The seven signed off on the greatest
tariff reductions ever achieved through international agreement.
In addition to those on some liquors, tariffs will be wiped
out on pharmaceuticals, construction equipment, medical equipment,
steel and beer. ("Does this mean I get a better price for Molson's
back in Washington?" Clinton joked to an aide. Probably not;
U.S. tariffs on the Canadian Molson's and other foreign beers
are little more than half a cent a bottle.) Tariffs will be
reduced 33% to as much as 50% on many other goods, including
wood, paper and scientific equipment. The agreement will go
into effect only if it is later incorporated into a pact among
all 111 members of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
that would also provide for free trade in services and especially
the hotly contested area of farm products.
</p>
<p> An important though ambiguous U.S.-Japanese agreement emerged
unexpectedly after the formal summit ended and Clinton was about
to leave Tokyo. The Americans had sought a "framework" agreement
to guide future negotiations aimed at reducing Japan's enormous
surpluses in trade with the U.S. (nearly $50 billion a year
currently). But negotiators argued through two nights, indulging
in such hairsplitting quarrels over wording that at one point
Clinton exclaimed, "You mean I flew all the way across the Pacific
to negotiate this?" Miyazawa ordered his bargainers not to let
Clinton go away empty-handed, and they complied--though only
after arguing so fiercely among themselves that two Japanese
officials got into a fistfight in the Okura Hotel at 3 a.m.
Saturday.
</p>
<p> Negotiations continued until 8:30, as, according to U.S. bargainers,
the Japanese started "backsliding" on some concessions. Clinton
was so worried about how the Japanese would present the pact
that he insisted on seeing a text of Miyazawa's prepared remarks
before joining in a press conference to break the news. He got
a text--in Japanese; with no time to prepare a written translation,
interpreter Jim Zumwalt had to read one aloud.
</p>
<p> The decision sounded like an agreement to agree. In fact the
agreement had teeth: the publicly stated threat of U.S. retaliation
against Japanese exports if Japan does not fulfill its commitments
to open its markets to U.S. products and services. The Japanese
pledged "to achieve a highly significant decrease" in the trade
surplus and to negotiate "sets of objective criteria" for gauging
progress. That, said Clinton, should lead to more Japanese buying
of American goods and services--autos and parts, computers,
telecommunications equipment, insurance and financial services.
</p>
<p> The Japanese were somewhat relieved at having, for the moment
at least, substituted muddy language for the precise targets
the Americans had achieved in the earlier semiconductor agreement,
which last year resulted in Tokyo's allowing U.S. computer chips
to gain a 20% share of the market in Japan. The Americans were
pleased that the agreement recognized a U.S. right to retaliate
if the agreement is not fulfilled, and stressed that the pact
called for twice-a-year reviews of prog ress, at which they
hope to hold Japanese feet to the fire.
</p>
<p> On aid to Russia, Clinton partly made up for an earlier blunder.
In April he had proposed a $4 billion package, provoking howls
from allies who had not been consulted. This time he prepared
carefully; aid to Russia was the subject of the calls he placed
while still winging across the Pacific. One of his main points:
Russian President Boris Yeltsin must not be made to look like
a beggar when he joined the talks Friday. The G-7 agreed on
a $3 billion package that Yeltsin seemed highly pleased with.
</p>
<p> Clinton scored on atmospherics as well as substance. Although
none of his fellow summiteers can be certain of staying in office
through 1996, as he can--some might not make it through the
end of this year--the U.S. President took care to question
them solicitously about what they were doing to resolve problems
that also beset the U.S., such as immigration, health care and
crime. "I think they were unprepared for his range of knowledge,"
said a U.S. aide. Hillary Rodham Clinton confined herself to
the kind of summit-spouse events--visits to candy factories,
Kabuki theaters, tea ceremonies, even a garbage incinerator--that she skips in the U.S. While she remained a model of
independence and influence to Japanese feminists, Mrs. Clinton's
demeanor convinced others that she is not the aggressive, meddlesome
woman they had read about. Crowds followed her in movie-star
admiration.
</p>
<p> In ironic counterpoint to all this success, Treasury Secretary
Lloyd Bentsen and National Economic Council director Robert
Rubin were on the phone to Washington late every night and before
dawn most mornings, seeking to round up support for restoring
in House-Senate conference the tax incentives for investment
that the Senate had stripped from Clinton's budget bill. They
did not get very far. The conference has yet to meet, but when
it does, it must somehow replace $20 billion in revenues sliced
out of the budget in the Senate, restore enough spending cuts
to keep House liberals in line, and yet achieve the deficit
reductions Clinton demands. There is no certainty it will.
</p>
<p> Clinton aides hope the Tokyo successes will help reverse his
slump in Washington. Said counselor David Gergen: "If the President
goes home with some substantive accomplishments under his belt,
that helps him at home. It changes the atmosphere." Perhaps.
But so far Clinton is in a position unlike most baseball teams,
especially championship ones: winning on the road, but not yet
at home.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>